Vetting from 3,000 miles

Choosing a cosmetic dentist you have never met in person, in a country you have never visited, for work that will change your face, is a specific kind of due diligence. Here is a systematic method that produces reliable results.

The instinct most first-time international dental patients have is to compensate for the distance by doing more research. This is the right instinct, but the wrong execution. More research on the wrong dimensions does not help. Focused research on the right dimensions transforms the outcome.

Here is the systematic method, in the order it should be run.

Step one: verify existence

Before you look at photos, before you read reviews, before you evaluate anything qualitative, verify that the practice and the specific practitioner you would work with actually exist as claimed. Sounds obvious. Almost nobody does it thoroughly.

For the practitioner. In Colombia, use ReTHUS at rethus.gov.co, the national health credential registry. Every practicing dentist in Colombia is listed there with their credentials, their specializations, and their current license status. Verification takes about two minutes and rules out both outright fraud and expired credentials.

For the practice. Verify the physical address on a mapping service. Verify the phone number by calling it during Colombian business hours and confirming you reach the practice. Verify the practice website domain registration matches the practice location (this is more paranoid than most patients need to be, but for major work it is worth doing).

Field note

The two-minute credential check that too few patients do

Every practicing dentist in Colombia is registered in ReTHUS. Every legitimate US dentist is registered with their state dental board. Every legitimate Canadian dentist is registered with their provincial dental college. These registries are free, public, and quick to check. If a practitioner you are considering is not in the appropriate registry, or if their registered credentials do not match what the practice website claims, stop. Full stop. This one check would prevent the vast majority of the horror stories that get published about international dental work.

Step two: evaluate the specific practitioner, not the practice

Practices market themselves as brands. You are not hiring a brand. You are hiring the specific human whose hands will be in your mouth. The distinction matters more than most patients realize.

Get the name of the specific dentist. Get their specialization (general, prosthodontist, oral surgeon, periodontist, endodontist, orthodontist). Get their years in practice. Get their published work if any exists. Get their portfolio of cases similar to yours. If the practice will not tell you which specific dentist will do your work, or if they will only tell you "one of our team," walk. That is not how serious dental care works.

Step three: evaluate portfolio like an art director, not a fan

The portfolios most practices publish are marketing artifacts. They are designed to make the work look as impressive as possible. That does not mean the work is bad. It means the portfolios systematically overstate the average outcome, and you have to compensate.

Look for cases similar to yours. A practice can be excellent at veneers and mediocre at implants, or vice versa. What matters is their track record on the specific procedure you need, not their overall reputation.

Look at the after photos in isolation. Cover the before shot. Does the after shot show a face that looks natural and appropriate? Or does it only make sense next to the before shot? Great work stands alone. Dependent work is a warning sign.

Ask for cases in the specific age range and condition close to yours. A twenty-eight-year-old veneer case does not tell you how well the practice does veneer work on a fifty-four-year-old with existing crowns.

Ask for at least one case where the outcome was not the practices best work. This is the single highest-signal request in the whole vetting process. A great practice will show you an honest case with a real trade-off. A weak practice will pretend they do not have any.

The moment I asked my prospective dentist to show me a case he was not fully proud of, he pulled up two cases and walked me through what he would do differently. That conversation is the reason I chose him. Nobody else would have shown me that.Reader letter, full veneer set patient

Step four: ask specific technical questions

You do not need to be a dental expert to ask technical questions well. You need to ask questions with specific answers, and to note whether the practitioner answers directly or evades.

Sample questions worth asking, adjusted for your procedure:

For veneers: What specific brand of porcelain do you use? Feldspathic or lithium disilicate? Do you use a prep or no-prep protocol for cases like mine, and why? How much enamel do you typically remove per tooth? What is your laboratory turnaround time?

For implants: What implant system do you use? What is your integration success rate on similar cases? Do you place immediately after extraction, or do you allow healing time first? What is your protocol for cases with bone loss?

For alignment: Which aligner system do you use, and why? What is your typical treatment duration for cases like mine? What is your retention protocol post-treatment?

Practitioners who answer directly and in detail are practitioners you can work with. Practitioners who deflect, generalize, or become uncomfortable are giving you important information.

How each vetting step correlates with patient satisfaction at 12-month follow-up
Approximate correlation with reported satisfaction, based on international dental patient surveys
Verified credentials via registry
+18%
Verified specific practitioner (not brand)
+22%
Reviewed portfolio for similar cases
+15%
Asked technical procedure questions
+19%
Video-consulted before committing
+27%
Obtained second opinion
+14%
Approximate. Directional patterns from patient satisfaction surveys, not a strict clinical study.

Step five: video consultation as the deciding factor

Do not commit without a live video consultation with the specific dentist who will do your work. Not with a coordinator. Not with a sales representative. With the dentist. This is the single highest-signal step in the whole process.

What you are watching for in the video consultation: Does the dentist actually look at your case? Do they ask clarifying questions about your goals? Do they explain trade-offs, not just benefits? Do they mention conservative alternatives to what they recommend? Do they seem interested in you as a specific patient, or are they running a script?

You will know within the first ten minutes of a video consultation whether this is somebody you can work with. Trust that instinct. Almost every patient who ignored a bad video consultation and traveled anyway reports that they should have listened to the video consultation.

Step six: the reference call

Ask the practice for two reference patients from your home country who had similar procedures and are willing to talk to you. Not written reviews. Not testimonials on the website. Actual patients on an actual phone call for fifteen minutes.

Reputable practices will provide these references. Weak practices will not. Both answers are useful. On the calls themselves, ask about the consultation experience, the treatment experience, any unexpected costs, the follow-up support, and one thing they wish they had known before their trip. The specifics you will get from these two calls are worth more than a hundred generic reviews.

Ready to start the vetting process for real?

See profiles of vetted Colombian dental practices with credential verification, portfolio access, and video consultation options.

See how it works
How many practices should I evaluate before choosing?

For major work, at least three. Video-consult with two or three finalists. The difference between the first and the third consultation is almost always the most valuable information you will get in the whole process.

Should I trust online reviews?

With significant caution. Aggregate reviews are useful for detecting patterns (many complaints about the same thing is a signal). Individual glowing reviews are almost meaningless. Reference calls with actual patients are worth ten times more than any written review.

Is it rude to ask a lot of questions during vetting?

Absolutely not. Serious practices welcome informed patients and know their reputation depends on satisfying them. If a practice treats extensive questions as annoying, they have told you something important about how they will treat you as a patient.